πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί NeurIPS 2026

🐦🐧 ReCoG: Relational Concept Graph
for Training-Free Personalization

Changseon Yu Hyeokjun Kweon

Foundational Vision Laboratory, Chung-Ang University

01 Prior: relation-agnostic 02 Ours: relation-aware

Abstract

Training-free personalization adapts a frozen vision-language model (VLM) to recognize user-defined concepts from only a few exemplars by retrieving concept entries at inference time. While recent retriever-based methods enrich each concept with descriptive evidence, they largely treat concepts in isolation, so the retrieved information can be plausible yet non-discriminative, especially when the personalized concept set contains highly confusable, fine-grained categories. We argue that personalization is inherently relational: correct recognition depends on the specific distinctions between a concept and its nearest alternatives. To this end, we propose ReCoG, a Relational Concept Graph for retrieval-augmented personalization. ReCoG represents concepts as nodes and augments them with directed edges that explicitly capture discriminative cues between concept pairs, elicited by a frozen VLM during database construction. At inference, ReCoG retrieves a shortlist and resolves ambiguity via explicit pairwise comparisons conditioned on the corresponding relational edges, selecting the concept that consistently wins against competing candidates. We also introduce FINGER benchmark to test personalized recognition on confusable concept sets. Across FINGER, ReCoG substantially outperforms prior methods, with the largest gains in the most confusable regimes. ReCoG also achieves consistently best performance on established personalization benchmarks including captioning and VQA, confirming that relational evidence is broadly beneficial beyond fine-grained settings.

Method

Figure 2 of the ReCoG paper: building the Relational Concept Graph with a frozen VLM and a discriminative prompt

Datasets

FINGER benchmark ours

FINGER (FINe-Grained pERsonalization) targets concept sets with high visual confusability.

CUB-Easy

20 species sampled at random from CUB-200-2011

Concepts
20
Images
1 support + 19 queries per concept (400)
πŸ€— Download ZIP

CUB-Hard

20 visually similar species selected with CUB attributes (predominantly black birds)

Concepts
20
Images
1 support + 19 queries per concept (400)
πŸ€— Download ZIP

CLEVR

Each concept is a scene configuration; queries are rendered from different viewpoints

Concepts
20
Images
1 support + 9 queries per concept (200)
πŸ€— Download ZIP
CUB-Easy: 20 concept support images in a 5-column by 4-row grid CUB-Hard: 20 concept support images in a 5-column by 4-row grid CLEVR: 20 scene support images in a 5-column by 4-row grid

Each panel shows one support image per concept (5 columns Γ— 4 rows). Click a panel to enlarge.

πŸ€— FINGER on Hugging Face

Established benchmarks

Results

FINGER benchmark

Table 1 of the ReCoG paper: recognition and captioning performance on the FINGER benchmark

Established benchmarks

Table 3 of the ReCoG paper: recognition/captioning on MyVLM, Yo'LLaVA, PerVA and VQA on Yo'LLaVA

BibTeX

@misc{yu2026recogrelationalconceptgraph,
      title={ReCoG: Relational Concept Graph for Training-Free Personalization}, 
      author={Changseon Yu and Hyeokjun Kweon},
      year={2026},
      eprint={2610.31282},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CV},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31282}, 
}